What is the difference between gpl, agpl and lgpl licenses. Disallowing proprietary use gives free software an edge over proprietary programs. Jun 15, 2012 relationships between the gpl licences and other software are carefully explained in the gpl faq. It is a specific implementation of his copyleft concept. The choice of licence comes down to personal preference, and both approaches can have good or bad. For this purpose the licensor must provide the source code of the software. Software licensing gpl agpl bsd mit apache eula youtube.
Not at allthere are many other free software licenses. If you wish to use a gpl program as the basis for a commercial product, you must again make your own source code freely available, in the sense of gpl, with the changes made. I have a concern of using gpl v2 and gpl v3 licensed software in commercial production environment. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu. Im not sure you would like to do that, as your entire application would have to be licensed under the gpl. When using larger packages, be sure to check not only the license for that package, but for all the. The following licenses are sorted by the number of conditions, from most gnu agplv3 to none unlicense.
Anyone may modify gpl ghostscript, but the provisions of 1 apply to modified or derived works as well. Can gnu licensed software be used for commercial gain. Commercial software is any software or program that is designed and developed for licensing or sale to end users or that serves a commercial purpose. I wont modify anything from source code and the architecture of the system requires the use of a load balancer. Why the gpl is incompatible with commercial software. Commercial software was once considered to be proprietary software, but now a number of free and opensource software applications are licensed or sold to end users. Gpl software can also be modified without restrictions, as long as the modified software is kept private. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law center. Dec 06, 2004 want to write a commercial shareware application. Nobody is ever permitted to take it away, in contrast to trial or educational versions of commercial software that will forbid your work in commercial situations. Its built with and comes with an awful lot of gpld software. Today gpl and free software is more about enforcing transparency for the users. The term free software is older, and is reflected in the name of the free software foundation fsf, an organization founded in 1985 to protect and promote free software.
You can get to it all, use it all, do anything you want with it. In this scenario, one option is a proprietary software license, which allows the possibility of creating proprietary applications derived from it, while the other license is a copyleft free software opensource license, thus requiring any derived work to be released under the. Gpl software can be used anywhere, without restrictions. The most widespread such license is the gnu general public license, or gnu gpl for short. My comments here are not about the validity or the great value of the gplit is an unquestionably. By using the image, youd have to force your entire application under the gpl. If you want an example of including gpl d software as part of a commercial offering, look at os x. Mar 31, 2011 the affero gpl is designed to close the socalled application service provider loophole in the gpl, which lets asps use gpl code without distributing their changes back to the open source community. Can i use images rendered with blender for commercial use.
Gpl license commercial use, you may copy, distribute and. You can license your commercial application under the gplv3 license as long as you comply with the terms of the gplv3 license. Spywares are everywhere in proprietary softwares, its a thing. Honestly, i would try to avoid the gpl anywhere you can.
If you intend to use the gpld software strictly within the company, you can make whatever changes you want. This is seldom something that developers of commercial products wish to do. If you want an example of including gpld software as part of a commercial offering, look at os x. Gpl code buried deep in software could give rise to a demand that you release your source code. The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a computer program the rights of the free software. Can i use the gplv3 license for my commercial application. Can i use gpl software binaries in commercial environment. Using gpllicensed components in proprietary projects. Open source licenses grant permission for anybody to use, modify, and share licensed software for any purpose, subject to conditions preserving the provenance and openness of the software. The gnu general public license permits making a modified version and letting the public access it on a server without ever releasing its source code to the public. I again dont so much care about the ethics bsds just fine as i do about the commercial impact. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a series of widely used free software licenses that guarantee end users the freedom to run, study, share, and modify the software. Ffmpeg is licensed under the gnu lesser general public license lgpl version 2. If you want to support free software, dont use too free a license.
In general, then, every program that is derived from gpl software exists under the terms of gpl. Frequently answered questions open source initiative. The gnu affero general public license is designed specifically to ensure that, in such cases, the modified source code becomes available to the community. The problem is that in the site there are a lot of fonts free for commercial use under gpl gnu license but without the font exception like for example dustismo font. Richard stallman created the gpl to protect the gnu software from being made proprietary. Some features, such as support for some external libraries libx264 and libx265 for example and various filters, are covered by the gnu general public license gpl version 2 or later see commercial x264 license exception below. But the wording of both the license and the faq is misleading, and the suggestion that you can gpl your commercial software is disingenuous. Apple isnt impeding or restricting your use of the gpld parts. Can gnu licensed software be used for commercial gain without.
It is legal but you need to understand the different licensing options out there. Gpl also does not limit commercial use, you just have to make the software available to all endusers when they request it. Jun 10, 20 ive used open source in commercial products. You may discover, however that these terms do not work so well in your favor, since one of the terms prevents you from a. Apple isnt impeding or restricting your use of the gpl d parts. Gnu public license is all but free and you should never use. Blenders gnu gpl license guarantees you this freedom. Pages in category software using the gpl license the following 150 pages are in this category, out of 150 total. The choice of licence comes down to personal preference, and both approaches can. If you intend to use the gpl d software strictly within.
In theory with some licenses reusage of your code must credit your original. The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it. Does all gnu software use the gnu gpl as its license. Linus torvalds says gpl v3 violates everything that gplv2 stood for duration. Stallman devised an alternative to the commercial software license and called it the gpl, or gnu public license. Multilicensing is commonly done to support free software business models in a commercial environment.
Why you should use a bsd style license for your open source. I have licensed every piece of software i have ever written under the gpl, i have been an active financial supporter of the free software foundation and software freedom conservancy and the work they do, and i advocate for the usage of the gpl. You can distribute your application using a gpl library commercially, but you must also provide the source code. Aug 26, 2008 early gpl enforcement efforts began soon after the gpl was written by richard stallman in 1989, and consisted of informal community efforts, often in public usenet discussions. This can be further shortened to gpl, when it is understood that the gnu gpl is the one intended. Apr 17, 2010 it restricts you from using software to build non gpl software including bsdlicensed free software, but it prevents software from being taken private by commercial developers.
The gpl is far, far more authorfriendly than the bsd license is. As a result, developers who use or distribute open source applications under the gpl can use the gpl licensed mysql software, and oems, isvs and vars that do not want to combine or distribute the mysql software with their own commercial software under a gpl license can purchase a commercial license. The gnu general public license v2 gpl v2 for short is the most commonly used open source licence. You may discover, however that these terms do not work so well in your favor, since one of the terms prevents you from adding restrictions to the license. For this reason gpl gnu team create the font exception that allows you to use any other license in your documents or artwork where gpl gnu licensed font was used.
Its built with and comes with an awful lot of gpl d software. Nov 08, 2015 linus torvalds says gpl v3 violates everything that gplv2 stood for duration. The gnu gpl grants the licensee a couple of rights. I was fortunate to work for a venture backed startup that had an attorney give us an education on the licensing models at that time, what the restrictions were of each, and how you needed to advertise the components you use in your product where required. This general public license applies to most of the free software foundations software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. Are gnugpl font free for commercial use 1001 fonts forums. Approximately 70% of the projects in the software repository sourceforge use the gpl v2. Provision 2 effectively prevents the development of proprietary commercial products that incorporate gpl ghostscript without a commercial license as a part, since these are derived works in the legal sense.
In fact, the fsf maintainers of the gpl have harsh words for licenses that try to restrict use of the software in any way. Gpl is the acronym for gnus general public license, and its one of the most popular open source licenses. By contrast, the gnu general public license is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free softwareto make sure the software is free for all its users. Jul 24, 2018 when the copyleft agpl was first published, many leaders in the open source community had something to say about the issue of a supposed loophole in the gpl open source license that allowed saas companies to integrate gpl open source libraries without sharing their code. The affero gpl is designed to close the socalled application service provider loophole in the gpl, which lets asps use gpl code without distributing their changes back to. Back in times, when internet was not such a thing and there were no git nor github, selling free software licensed under gpl as is was a profitable business model. Relationships between the gpl licences and other software are carefully explained in the gpl faq. The licenses were originally written by richard stallman, former head of the free software foundation fsf, for the gnu project, and grant the recipients of a. Sep 03, 2016 gpl, also known as copyleft, grants permission to reuse or modify the source code to make derivative works, but if you distribute your program to others, it requires you to license your derivative work under the gpl too.
1388 63 1667 589 532 121 781 1067 747 1385 1228 860 1408 781 1252 662 808 1263 381 622 164 1136 343 721 1443 1254 1437 801 913 954 386 50 692 1 807 1622 336 1480 1044 141 461 988 1063 168 440 855 510